You are here: Wild Ideas > Forest > Library >
The Soul of Nature:
The Meaning of Ecological Spirituality
Copyright 1996 by Lynna Landstreet. See contents
page for full permissions.
14: Spirituality, culture and identity
is, of course, a certain amount of overlap between the neo-pagan movement
and spiritual deep ecology. The concept of divinity immanent within
nature, the centrality of Gaia/Mother Earth imagery, the emphasis on
seasonal cycles -- the Earth First! Journal is published on the
eight major Wiccan festivals -- and so on. Both groups tend to share
a concern with bioregionalism -- learning to live "in place",
to belong to the place where you live. And there are important ways
in which the two movements can complement each other, with deep ecology
providing an explicitly political framework within which neo-pagans
can apply their commitment to the earth, and Wicca and neo-paganism
providing more suitable sources for ritual material for non-Native deep
ecologists wishing to avoid cultural appropriation.
In fact, some native activists have explicitly told people of European
ancestry to start working with their own ancestral religions instead
of pirating native beliefs. In a political speaking tour of Germany,
Ward Churchill, Bob Robideau, Annette Jaimes and Paulette D'Auteuil
told audiences of European "wanna-be's" in no uncertain terms
to stick to their own roots:
You seem to feel that you are either completely
disconnected from your own heritage of having been conquered and colonized,
or that you can and should disconnect yourselves from it as a means
of destroying that which oppresses you. We are not unique in being indigenous.
Everyone is indigenous somewhere You are not necessarily part
of the colonizing, predatory reality called "Europe." You
are not even necessarily "Germans," with all that implies.
You are, or can be, who your ancestors were and who the faith-keepers
of your cultures remain: Angles, Saxons, Huns, Goths, Visigoths. The
choice is yours, but in order for it to have meaning, you must meet
the responsibilities that come with it.
Elsewhere, Churchill states, in a viewpoint strikingly similar to that
of the cultural reconstructionist traditions within neo-paganism, that:
What we have to understand is that in order
for Europeans to do what they have done to virtually all non-Europeans,
all non-Westerners on the planet, they had to colonize themselves. These
colonizers are colonized.
They too are indigenous people. Not here. But somewhere they
are indigenous people, with indigenous understandings of the land, and
all the things we counterpoise to the predator reality that engulfs
us now. They need to get back in touch with that, you see. They must
recover that which was taken from them in the process of colonization,
taken in the same fashion that things are being taken from us now.
And it may be that we [Natives] can be helpful to
them in that regard, once they have recognized the need for that to
occur, to get back to what it meant to be Gaelic or Celtic, to find
out what Anglo-Saxon really meant before the synthesis of "Europe"
was effected. I can talk to Basques and Celts. I can't talk to Europeans.
All content copyright 1999-2006 by the
individual authors, where cited, or by
where not specifically credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
Site design: Spider Silk Design - Toronto web designers
This page last modified: January 29, 2006