| 
					 You are here: Wild Ideas > Forest > Library >    
	
	 
        
          The Soul of Nature: 
            The Meaning of Ecological Spirituality
           
          Copyright 1996 by Lynna Landstreet. See contents 
          page for full permissions. 
           
          9: Magic and the problem of belief
        
         he 
          third axis -- the acceptance, condemnation or outright rejection of 
          the possibility of magic or paranormal phenomena -- may seem initially 
          the most difficult to relate to environmental concerns. But I think 
          that there may be more of a connection that might at first appear to 
          be the case. A society's view of magic may in fact say a great deal 
          about where that society perceives itself in relation to the world, 
          in terms of the locus of power and control. A world where magic can 
          happen is a world where we don't have all the answers, a world where 
          nature still holds the power to surprise us, to confound our expectations 
          and evade our attempts at categorization, prediction and control. 
	In my view, the acceptance of the possibility of magic is rooted 
          in humility -- it is a tacit admission that we don't know everything. 
          Conversely, the denial of magic is rooted in control fetishism -- in 
          the blind faith that nothing we don't understand can exist. Even the 
          term "supernatural" in itself implies a faith in the possibility 
          of some sort of absolute knowledge of what is "natural." 
	I find that this faith in the ability, and perhaps more importantly, 
          the right, of human beings to define the bounds of reality, to 
          dictate what nature should and should not be allowed to do, is disturbingly 
          widespread, even among many who are otherwise quite critical of anthropocentric 
          biases. I sometimes refer to the common perception that things cease 
          to exist if we stop believing in them as the Tinkerbell syndrome, after 
          the well-known scene in stage productions of Peter Pan where the audience 
          is exhorted to clap their hands if they believe in fairies, in order 
          to save Tinkerbell from being destroyed by their disbelief. 
	This view can be seen in the popular interpretations of a legend originally 
          told by Roman writer Plutarch about a ship which was stopped in mid-voyage 
          by a mysterious voice from nowhere announcing demanding that the captain 
          carry the following message (as recounted by Elizabeth Barrett Browning 
          in her poem "The Dead Pan") home with them: 
        And that dismal cry 
          rose slowly, 
          And sank slowly through the air. 
          "Pan is dead! -- Great Pan is dead -- 
          Pan, Pan is dead."[27] 
           
        Dolores LaChappelle points out that the Greek god Pan has often been 
          portrayed as representative of the old gods in their entirety due to 
          his name, which means "all" in Greek, and adds that: 
        Plutarch's story, dating 
          from the second century, predates the time of Constantine by roughly 
          150 years; yet, according to the Christians, this was a clear prophecy 
          that all the pagan gods were gone; only the one Christian God remained.[28] 
           
        So, apart from the temporal problems, we have here perhaps the classic 
          example of what could be termed the ultimate in anthropocentric hubris: 
          the idea that the human mind, human belief, is so potent that it can 
          literally destroy gods. Nietzche's famous "God is dead" is 
          only a refinement of the basic sentiment expressed here. 
	A similar viewpoint was expressed by Neil Evernden, who in his Nature 
          and Society class in 1995 remarked upon the lingering traces of magic 
          in mediaeval sensibility, wherein a field might contain messages from 
          God. Nowadays, he added, this could not be. When I suggested, only half-jokingly, 
          that perhaps it wasn't that the messages that were gone, but that the 
          majority of people had stopped paying attention to them, he adamantly 
          insisted that no, the messages were no longer there. If the majority 
          of people don't believe in something, apparently, it cannot exist. 
	Personally, I tend to feel that the divinity of nature, like "the 
          beauty of things" that the poet Robinson Jeffers writes of, 
        ...was born before eyes 
          and 
          sufficient to itself; the heart-breaking beauty 
          Will remain when there is no heart to break for it.[29] 
         
         
           
            
         
         
	
	 
   
   
	
						
					   
					
					 
					
					All content copyright 1999-2006 by the 
						individual authors, where cited, or by 
						Lynna Landstreet
						where not specifically credited. 
					
					 
						Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a  
						Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 
						2.5 License.
						 
					
					
  
						Site design: Spider Silk Design - Toronto web designers 
						This page last modified: January 29, 2006 
					
					 |